No, The Appeals Court Didn\u2019t Save Us From Insane Decision Blocking Abortion Pill<\/p>\n
The Fifth Circuit panel broke from Kacsmaryk on rejecting the 2000 FDA approval, saying that the six-year statute of limitations to challenge that agency action has passed (though without much conviction, saying that the anti-abortion plaintiffs may win on that topic at another stage of litigation). But it agreed with Kacsmaryk on nearly everything else.<\/p>\n
Read more at Talking Points Memo<\/a><\/p>\n Trump-Nominated Judge Who Issued Radical Abortion Pill Ruling Cited An Absurd \u2018Study\u2019<\/p>\n The conservative federal judge in Texas cited a study of responses to subway ads in an order that could ban the abortion pill mifepristone nationwide.<\/p>\n Read more at Huffpost<\/a><\/p>\n What last night\u2019s abortion pill twist means for access \u2014 even in blue states<\/p>\n Unless the Supreme Court intervenes, the 5th Circuit\u2019s decision means that starting Saturday, mifepristone will remain legal at the federal level but access will be much more restricted.<\/p>\n Read more at Politico<\/a><\/p>\n Washington Judge Tells FDA To Keep Mifepristone Available As Usual In States Involved<\/p>\n He added that \u201cirrespective of the Northern District of Texas Court ruling or the Fifth Circuit\u2019s anticipated ruling,\u201d defendants are prohibited from \u201caltering the status quo and rights as it relates to the availability of Mifepristone under the current operative January 2023 Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy under 21 U.S.C. \u00a7 355-1 in Plaintiff States and the District of Columbia.\u201d<\/p>\n Read more at Talking Points Memo<\/a><\/p>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" No, The Appeals Court Didn\u2019t Save Us From Insane Decision Blocking Abortion Pill The Fifth Circuit panel broke from Kacsmaryk on rejecting the 2000 FDA approval, saying that the six-year statute of limitations to challenge that agency action has passed (though without much conviction, saying that the anti-abortion plaintiffs may win on that topic at … Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[172,107,168,181,10],"class_list":["post-927","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-abortion-bans","tag-abortion-pills","tag-anti-abortion-judges","tag-anti-abortion-laws","tag-texas"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/no-rights-to-speak-of.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/927","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/no-rights-to-speak-of.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/no-rights-to-speak-of.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/no-rights-to-speak-of.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/no-rights-to-speak-of.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=927"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/no-rights-to-speak-of.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/927\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":930,"href":"https:\/\/no-rights-to-speak-of.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/927\/revisions\/930"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/no-rights-to-speak-of.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=927"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/no-rights-to-speak-of.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=927"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/no-rights-to-speak-of.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=927"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}