Judge\u2019s abortion pill decision embraces extreme language and ideology of anti-abortion movement, experts say<\/p>\n
In interviews, several legal and medical experts said Kacsmaryk\u2019s decision was unprecedented and clearly ideological. His language and reasoning, they said, closely mirrored arguments and concepts put forward by the anti-abortion movement \u2014 at the expense of scientific consensus in some instances.<\/p>\n
Read more at NBC News <\/a><\/p>\n The Hidden Radicalism Of The Abortion Pill Ruling: A Nationwide Abortion Ban<\/p>\n Tucked into a Texas judge\u2019s decision<\/a> to invalidate the federal approval of the medical abortion drug mifepristone is a much more sweeping goal: the implementation of a nationwide ban on all abortions.<\/p>\n Read more at Huffpost<\/a><\/p>\n Upholding Kacsmaryk\u2019s Decision Would Invite Challenges To Vaccines, Contraception<\/p>\n These problems with the case make it an enormous risk \u2014 even beyond making mifepristone unavailable for the millions who need it \u2014 should Kacsmaryk\u2019s ruling be upheld. It could fling wide the floodgates to those seeking to challenge the FDA\u2019s approval in an attempt to get certain drugs removed from the market.<\/p>\n Read more at Talking Points Memo<\/a><\/p>\n The Dishonesty Of Matthew Kacsmaryk\u2019s Abortion Pill Ruling<\/p>\n Before we move on to the aftermath of the abortion pill ruling from Friday, it needs to sink in how bad U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk\u2019s opinion was by any objective standard of intellectual honesty.<\/p>\n Read more at Talking Points Memo<\/a><\/p>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Judge\u2019s abortion pill decision embraces extreme language and ideology of anti-abortion movement, experts say In interviews, several legal and medical experts said Kacsmaryk\u2019s decision was unprecedented and clearly ideological. His language and reasoning, they said, closely mirrored arguments and concepts put forward by the anti-abortion movement \u2014 at the expense of scientific consensus in some … Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[172,107,168,141,146,147,10],"class_list":["post-904","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-abortion-bans","tag-abortion-pills","tag-anti-abortion-judges","tag-anti-abortion-strategy","tag-comstock-act","tag-fda","tag-texas"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/no-rights-to-speak-of.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/904","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/no-rights-to-speak-of.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/no-rights-to-speak-of.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/no-rights-to-speak-of.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/no-rights-to-speak-of.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=904"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/no-rights-to-speak-of.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/904\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":905,"href":"https:\/\/no-rights-to-speak-of.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/904\/revisions\/905"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/no-rights-to-speak-of.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=904"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/no-rights-to-speak-of.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=904"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/no-rights-to-speak-of.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=904"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}