{"id":1812,"date":"2024-01-10T23:03:14","date_gmt":"2024-01-11T07:03:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/no-rights-to-speak-of.net\/?p=1812"},"modified":"2024-01-10T23:03:14","modified_gmt":"2024-01-11T07:03:14","slug":"do-pregnant-women-have-a-right-to-urgent-medical-care-no-according-to-a-us-court-opinion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/no-rights-to-speak-of.net\/index.php\/2024\/01\/10\/do-pregnant-women-have-a-right-to-urgent-medical-care-no-according-to-a-us-court-opinion\/","title":{"rendered":"Do pregnant women have a right to urgent medical care? No, according to a US court &#8211; opinion"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Do doctors have an obligation under federal law to keep their patients alive, even if their patients happen to be pregnant women? Do doctors have an obligation to prevent maiming \u2013 or irreversible organ damage, or other kinds of serious bodily harm \u2013 and if so, does that obligation extend even to women? Do women have a right to access medically necessary care even if they are pregnant? No, according to the US fifth circuit court.<\/p>\n<p>Read more at <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/commentisfree\/2024\/jan\/10\/pregnant-women-urgent-medical-care-us-court-texas\">The Guardian<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Do doctors have an obligation under federal law to keep their patients alive, even if their patients happen to be pregnant women? Do doctors have an obligation to prevent maiming \u2013 or irreversible organ damage, or other kinds of serious bodily harm \u2013 and if so, does that obligation extend even to women? Do women &#8230; <a title=\"Do pregnant women have a right to urgent medical care? No, according to a US court &#8211; opinion\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/no-rights-to-speak-of.net\/index.php\/2024\/01\/10\/do-pregnant-women-have-a-right-to-urgent-medical-care-no-according-to-a-us-court-opinion\/\" aria-label=\"More on Do pregnant women have a right to urgent medical care? No, according to a US court &#8211; opinion\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[221,172,90,10],"class_list":["post-1812","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-5th-circuit","tag-abortion-bans","tag-maternal-death-rates","tag-texas"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/no-rights-to-speak-of.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1812","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/no-rights-to-speak-of.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/no-rights-to-speak-of.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/no-rights-to-speak-of.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/no-rights-to-speak-of.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1812"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/no-rights-to-speak-of.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1812\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1813,"href":"https:\/\/no-rights-to-speak-of.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1812\/revisions\/1813"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/no-rights-to-speak-of.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1812"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/no-rights-to-speak-of.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1812"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/no-rights-to-speak-of.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1812"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}