“There’s two issues here: One is the slippery slope that we’ve seen play out that normalizes the idea of an unborn child, or fetus, or fertilized egg, or embryo as an entity for which you can attach rights,” Sussman explains. The second issue is the bill would create an opportunity for another person — the other partner — to make an argument that he has the legal standing to sue over a pregnancy outcome. “It just takes someone who’s willing to try that legal theory out — and as we’ve seen, judges accept rogue arguments,” Sussman says.
Read more at Rolling Stone